Search This Blog

CCE in brief

My photo
Recovering backpacker, Cornwallite at heart, political enthusiast, catalyst, writer, husband, father, community volunteer, unabashedly proud Canadian. Every hyperlink connects to something related directly or thematically to that which is highlighted.
Showing posts with label Sochi Olympics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sochi Olympics. Show all posts

Monday, 20 January 2014

A Dirty Business: The Powers of the State in the Hands of a Terrorist







Clean up.  As in, to cleanse.  Cleansing society of "nontraditional" people who get in the way of the strength and upwards trajectory of Mother Russia.  

This should all sound chillingly familiar.  But Putin's not the first Eastern European leader to talk about the need to cleanse his country of the unpure.  Greece's Golden Dawn has been making that same argument, showing just how far they're willing to go in furtherance of a "racially pure" Greece.  In Hungary, Jobbik is promising to deliver a safe and security society - just not for everyone.

Economic times are lean, politics has gotten dirtier and angry people are looking for scapegoats.  We've seen this before, too.

But back to Putin.  


Canadians fundamentally don't get Putin, because there is no one with his profile on our political landscape.  We look at the likes of a Stephen Harper as the epitome of political ruthlessness and efficiency, pummelling his opponents with attack ads and talking the tough economic talk.  


Yet Harper backs away from tough fights and would never allow himself to be photographed topless in fatigue pants, sporting a rifle.  


Putin isn't so obsessed with political attack ads and trying to undermine the very existence of political parties he doesn't like.  To him, that's amateur-hour.  When Putin wants someone gone, they disappear.  

Whereas Harper was horrified at the video he saw of Ashley Smith's time in prison, Putin would likely have shaken his head at the inefficient approach of the prison guards.  Where Obama hummed and hawed over the risks of collateral damage and brand risk with the assassination of Osama bin Laden, Putin has no such reservations.  


He's not pompous and delusional in the manner of a Muammar Gaddafi; he's not a cartoon caricature of the moustache-twitching bad guy.  Putin wears suits, takes part in photo ops, does the head-of-state thing.  As such it's easier, even more comfortable for us to view him through the political lens with which we're familiar.  But make no mistake - when he talks about cleansing and population, he's circling around a final solution.

Putin will not have articulated this sentiment - few ever do - but he likely feels about homosexuality the way he would about a virus like ebola; it's a contagion that threatens the health of his country.  There's a set trajectory that gets followed when leaders try to protect majority populations from infections:

- defining at-risk populations
- screening and surveillance
- controlling the infected groups through containment
- removal of the cause of infection, preventing further transmission
- cycle back to A with greater vigour



It's what the Nazi death camps were for.  The SS in particular were neat freaks - it's why the analogy between Jews and rabid rats was so psychologically effective.  But removing risky populations was what Soviet Gulags were for, too.  Of course as goes on, the scope of risky infections starts to spread; minority groups threaten the health of the majority population.


So do new ideas that seek to corrupt traditional culture.  To protect against the waves of troubles lapping at the shores of the nation, leaders must consolidate power.  It's a vicious cycle.

Of course, homosexuality isn't an infection, no matter how people like Putin feel about it.  It's a mix of genetics (sexual inclinations) and culture (definitions of sexuality).  Believe it or not, but not everyone breaks down their categories of sexual preference into "straight" or "gay."  Some societies have three genders, while in some cultures, individuals are believed to swap genders over the course of their lives.

However you define it, though, homosexuality is natural - not a perversion, nor a corruption, but something that is repeatedly witnessed throughout the animal kingdom.  It's just part of the great genetic soup that allows for adaption to changing environments.



So Putin is entering into a battle he cannot hope to win - but because he's so confident in his strength and power, the odds of him recognizing this fact are minimal.  So it'll get worse until he's gone, and probably continue to be be had long after.


Here lies a tragic irony.  By trying to eliminate undesirable minorities, Putin is doing the same thing as the terrorists who are threatening to muck up his Olympics.  Extremist groups, be they Vilyat Dagest or Branch Davidians works the same way, only from the position of a minority.  To them, psychologically, the rabid hordes of the inferior majority are like zombies, an infectious threat to be walled off or better yet, eliminated.

The Jewish threat, the Red Scare or the belief that America Stands Alone while Europe is Islamified; broken down, there's no difference between these points of view and the fear of any viral infection.  

It should come as no surprise that the tactics used by tyrants and terrorists are the same; the biggest difference is that heads of state have access to more resources.

There are far too many leaders out there today trying to cleanse their countries of undesirables.  The longer the rest of us choose to avoid getting dirty, the messier things are going to get.



Friday, 29 November 2013

Sochi! Come to Sochi!




So, Putin wants to turn Sochi into an internationally popular resort, does he?  At the same time as he's taking his entire country on a homophobic bender?  I just hope he isn't looking for sponsorship from Apple, or any of the more than 60 big companies standing against gay marriage bans in the U.S.


The fact that one of Russia's athletes just caught fire doesn't help Putin's brand much - catching fire as a metaphor is all the rage, these days.


See, people don't just want selfish entertainment any more - they want to feel like they're contributing to something with their consumption.  Smart companies are realizing what politicians are slow to do - populism secures a base, but sucks at growing your market share.  For that, you need to think laterally.

So, in the name of value-added altruism, here's a little song I wrote to help Putin with his ad campaign (to the tune of The Flinstone's theme:)


Sochi!  Come to Sochi!
You'll ski and gamble without fear
That is unless you're queer.
Rob Ford dances

Don't mind all the hiccups
With finance and construction gaffes
And don't question Putin
The man is not known to laugh.

Why do the torches die without delay?
Does Gazprom sponsor the relay?

But when you're at Sochi
You'll have a sparking time
We'll catch on fire in time

Let's have a gay old time!


Friday, 23 August 2013

Vladimir Putin Reads WAKATA




The Rossiyskaya Gazeta, the official government newspaper, published the presidential decree Friday, listing an array of measures tightening security in the Olympic host city, including the ban on public assemblies. All "gatherings, rallies, demonstrations, marches and pickets" that are not part of the Olympics or the Paralympics will be prohibited in Sochi from Jan. 7 to March 21, the decree said.

First, there was Martin Goldfarb.  Then came Stephen Harper.  I have a sneaking suspicion Bob Rae might have paid me a visit.  But this trumps 'em all.

The day after I post on the inevitability of LGBTQ protests in Sochi and how bad it'll be for Putin, he puts out a notice that protests are banned.  Yay for me, I've influenced Russian policy!  (It's at least a possibility - I have had 206 hits from Russia so far this week.  That's gotta count for something.)


Alas, even if I have inspired Putin to action, the poor fellow seems to have missed the meat of my advice - stifling dissent isn't going to work.  Not in a forum like the Olympics.  They'll never be able to screen out all protesters, nor scare everyone into submission.  With celebrity interest in the event there will inevitably be people of global profile poking the bear over gay rights and doing so in a public way, making Putin look like the tyrannical stick-in-the-mud he is.


How he'll respond to that communications crisis will be interesting, but even more important will be the international community's response to him.  We've had a lot of vague protests from Western governments against an increasing number of volatile, civilian-threatening situations in the world, but that's been about it.  Should, say, American or Canadian citizens are mistreated while defending human rights in Russia, they (and the IOC) are going to have to show some sterner stuff.  Their constituents will demand nothing less.

The simplest way for the West to head-off any difficult scenario around the Olympics would be to push for them to instead be held in Vancouver.  Russia would definitely respond to such a slight, though - and it wouldn't do anything to address the root cause of the conflict.  

The best long-term solution would be for Putin to have a Damascus moment, quit being a thug and start showing some true leadership by rescinding the law and promoting equality for all Russians.

If he keeps on reading WAKATA, I'm sure he'll find something to help him along his way.