The death of Sammy Yatim has brought back into focus the
nature of police training and supports, especially where it comes to their
interaction with Emotionally Disturbed People (EDPs). A big question raised is the suitability of
police as first-responders to EDP calls, although that’s a difficult nut to
crack. Programs like MCIT help some, but
the reality is that police, by the nature of policing, will continue to be
first responders; until such time as every citizen can identify the
neurochemical causes of erratic behaviour, a 911 call involving aggressive or
irrational individuals is going to find its way into police dispatches.
Another big concern that has been raised – this isn’t the
first time the way police interact with EDPs has come to light. It’s not even the first time a study has been
called for. In fact, multiple studies
have been commissioned and they all tend to present the same findings – yet nothing
really changes. Struggling to find
solutions that have public appeal and actually tackle the problem puts
governments in a corner; the general public isn’t interested in complex
solutions, they want clear deliverables they can understand and read about in
action-oriented headlines.
The Government of Ontario, trying to demonstrated proactive
action in some manner, has decided to expand police access to tasers. The theory is that putting more varied tools
into the hands of front-line police officers will give them greater on-the-spot
choice, reducing their likelihood of unnecessarily turning to lethal force as a
problem-solver.
I’d be interested to see the psychological studies that back
up that assessment. I’m gonna go out on
a limb and guess that there aren’t many.
There’s probably some hope in policing, justice and
government circles that the problem will just blow over as new stories grab the
headlines and capture public attention; that’s what generally happens with
stories like this. It’s why we have a
series of not-acted on reports in the first place.
What if there was another way? What if the solution wasn’t to put more
offensive weapons in the hands of isolate front-line officers but instead give
them tools that connect them together and provide better access to supportive
information?
It’s being done elsewhere, in a number of different
ways. Social media is playing a key role
in this perception shift of what’s best for both front-line officers and the
people they interact with.
Without giving away spoilers, there are some cool applications
of smartphone Apps being applied to security-related uses. Then, there are tools like Blueline and PoliceOne
that are expanding on the capacity of social media platforms like Facebook and
LinkedIn to create safe spaces for law enforcement personnel to share
information, best practices and to provide peer support.
There are good models in here that I hope the people looking
into Sammy Yatim’s death are looking into.
The solutions we’re looking for are literally being written, now.
It just takes someone to connect the dots, sell the story –
and decision makers willing to implement change.
No comments:
Post a Comment